Understanding the Swedish antibiotic stewardship through healthcare professionals’ meaning making of antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance in Swedish hospitals
The global antibiotic stewardship depicts antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance as constituting a global public health threat that has implications for global health, the global economy, global security and sustainability. Prudent and wise use of antibiotics have been recognized in global measures and interventions that are designed to optimize antibiotics worldwide. However, these programmes tend to overlook the social aspects and dynamics of antibiotic usage, which has important repercussions for the successful implementation of antimicrobial stewardship.
Sweden has been acclaimed internationally for its particular approach to antibiotic stewardship. The country has a low rate of antibiotic prescription and use in comparison with its European counterparts. However, despite Sweden’s commendable efforts towards a robust and well-funded antibiotic stewardship, there are still controversial moments where clinical imperatives and stewardship goals are in conflict with one another. Given the difficulties of setting priorities that encompass both stewardship and clinical goals, even in the well-resourced Swedish context, research into the social and contextual dimensions of antibiotic usage in situ is warranted.
This study explores contexts where antibiotic usage is high and clinical imperatives are demanding to explore how clinicians weigh up and interpret the various competing imperatives in their daily clinical practice. The study seeks to understand how healthcare professionals in emergency healthcare units, Medicinsk Intermerdiärvårdavdelning (MIVA) and Medicinskt Akutvårdsavdeldning (MAVA) at various Swedish hospitals reflect upon rational use of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in their daily work. Moreover, the study explores how healthcare professionals at these emergency units relate to evidence- based guidelines on rational use of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in hospitals.
Researchers at UU
Related published research
- Broom, Alex, Jon Adams, and Philip Tovey. 2009. “Evidence-Based Healthcare in Practice: A Study of Clinician Resistance, Professional de-Skilling, and Inter-Specialty Differentiation in Oncology.” Social Science & Medicine 68 (1): 192–200.
- Broom, Alex, Jennifer Broom, and Emma Kirby. 2014. “Cultures of Resistance? A Bourdieusian Analysis of Doctors’ Antibiotic Prescribing.” Social Science & Medicine 110: 81–88.
- Broom, Alex, Jennifer Broom, Emma Kirby, Stefanie Plage, and Jon Adams. 2015. “What Role Do Pharmacists Play in Mediating Antibiotic Use in Hospitals? A Qualitative Study.” BMJ Open 5 (11): e008326.
- Broom, J., A. Broom, E. Kirby, A. F. Gibson, and J. J. Post. 2017. “How Do Hospital Respiratory Clinicians Perceive Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS)? A Qualitative Study Highlighting Barriers to AMS in Respiratory Medicine.” Journal of Hospital Infection 96 (4): 316–22.
- Broom, J., A. Broom, S. Plage, K. Adams, and J. J. Post. 2016. “Barriers to Uptake of Antimicrobial Advice in a UK Hospital: A Qualitative Study.” Journal of Hospital Infection 93 (4): 418–22.
- Broom, Jennifer K., Alex F. Broom, Emma R. Kirby, Alexandra F. Gibson, and Jeffrey J. Post. 2017. “Clinical and Social Barriers to Antimicrobial Stewardship in Pulmonary Medicine: A Qualitative Study.” American Journal of Infection Control 45 (8): 911–16.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018. “The Threat of Antibiotic Resistance and What CDC Is Doing to Protect People.” Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- Chandler, C., E. Hutchinson, and C. Hutchison. 2016. “Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance Through Social Theory: An Anthropologically Oriented Report.” Monograph. 2016.